Legal Opinion

Slocum v. Phillips Petroleum Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 29, 1983No. 53937PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRWIN, Justice.

Phillips Petroleum Company (Phillips) constructed a pipeline across appellee’s (owner’s) property without authorization or owner’s consent. Owner brought an action in trespass to recover actual and exemplary damages and also sought a mandatory injunction requiring Phillips to remove its pipeline.

Owner recovered a judgment of $5,260.00 for actual damages and $60,000.00 for exemplary damages. The trial court denied owner’s request for the mandatory injunction.

Phillips appealed and only challenges the award for exemplary damages. Owner cross-appealed and challenges the trial…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Oden v. RussellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  2. Dilworth v. FortierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  3. Cox v. TheusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  4. Edwards v. LachmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  5. Kasner v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Graham v. KeuchelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. Newport v. USAASupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  3. David Lee Willis v. Midland Risk Insurance Company, and Rogers County Insurance AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  4. Mullins v. WardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  5. Estrada v. PORT CITY PROPERTIES, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API