Legal Opinion
Fitzmaurice v. Boston, Revere Beach & Lynn Railroad
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided May 29, 1926PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.
It was undisputed at the trial that the plaintiff while a passenger on a train of the defendant and in the exercise of due care suffered personal injuries from a derailment of the car caused by the breaking of an axle. The plaintiff asked the trial judge to rule as follows:
“4. The doctrine of res ipso loquitur applies to this case. It applies in the case of an unexplained accident which in the ordinary experience of mankind would not have happened without fault on the part of the defendant.”
“8. The plaintiff having shown the derailing of the car, this fact until explained by the defendant,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Carroll v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Conners Bros. v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
- Marshall v. Boston & Worcester Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Nolan v. Newton Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Spooner v. Old Colony Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Roscigno v. Colonial Beacon Oil Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Garrett v. M. McDonough Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Knych v. Trustees of New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- McFarlane v. McCourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Kennebec Water DistrictSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.