Legal Opinion

Roscigno v. Colonial Beacon Oil Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 2, 1936PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.

On February 10, 1928, the plaintiff sustained personal injuries from the explosion of a vaporizer tank in the oil storage and refining plant of the defendant, more than a quarter of a mile away from the plaintiff's house. The same explosion resulted in the case of Anderson v. Beacon Oil Co. 281 Mass. 108.

In the case at bar, an action of tort for alleged negligence, there was no evidence of specific negligence, and the only question is whether the rule res ipso loquitur applies. If it does, the burden of proof of negligence remains on the plaintiff (Fitzmaurice v. Boston, Revere Beach & Lynn…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Sweeney v. ErvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Glowacki v. North Western Ohio Ry. & Power Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Carroll v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  4. Cosulich v. Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. Graham v. BadgerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Liberatore v. Town of FraminghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. Carter v. Yardley & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  3. Zezuski v. Jenny Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  4. Evangelio v. Metropolitan Bottling Co. Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  5. Enrich v. Windmere Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API