Legal Opinion

McFarlane v. McCourt

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 1, 1936PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

These are actions of tort arising out of a collision between two motor vehicles. The declaration in each case alleges that the defendant negligently controlled or operated a motor vehicle and that the said negligence was responsible for the accident. The defendant’s answer was the same in each case, consisting of a general denial and a denial of agency, and pleas of contributory negligence and the statute of limitations. It was agreed by the plaintiffs and the defendant, through counsel, that the automobile which is alleged to have caused the damages complained *86of, was properly registered in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carroll v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  2. Roscigno v. Colonial Beacon Oil Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  3. Glaser v. SchroederMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  4. Webber v. Old Colony Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  5. Fitzmaurice v. Boston, Revere Beach & Lynn RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cooney v. SpackMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1954
  2. Langevin v. ClouatreMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1950
  3. Morin v. FragelaMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API