Legal Opinion

Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Kennebec Water District

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 3, 1943PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThaxter, J.

This action on the case to recover damages caused by the alleged negligence of the defendant was heard by the presiding justice with the right of exceptions reserved, lie ordered the entry of judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $1,828.15 and the case is before us on the defendant’s exceptions. The claim is that there is not sufficient evidence to support the finding.

The plaintiff operated a grocery store in the City of Water-ville. The defendant supplied water service to the plaintiff. To measure the water used, the defendant on November 22,1938, approximately two years and a half prior…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chicago Union Traction Co. v. GieseIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Chaisson v. WilliamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1931
  3. Baran v. Reading Iron Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  4. Shea v. HernSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1934
  5. Edwards v. Cumberland County Power & Light Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Burke Engineering Sales Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  2. Gould v. Bangor and Aroostook Railroad CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API