Legal Opinion

Finney v. Long

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 14, 1927No. 6 Div. 869PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The three counts on which the trial was had were common counts and on alleged contract. The latter count avers that defendants employed the plaintiff as an agent to sell designated lots and agreed to pay plaintiff the 'customary real estafe commission of 5 per cent, of the first $5,000 sales price and 2% per cent, of the balance; and it is further averred that as such agent the property was sold for the price of $7,000 on October 1, 1923, and that defendants breached the contract in that they failed to pay as agreed upon and recited above. The demurrer being overruled, the reply thereto was…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  3. Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  4. Georgia Cotton Co. v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  5. Shipp v. SheltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Nichols v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
  2. Fisher v. Comer Plantation, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. Seigel v. Cambridge-Wendell Realty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  4. Chestang v. KirkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  5. Ellison v. Sudduth Realty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API