Legal Opinion

Ellison v. Sudduth Realty Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 29, 1928No. 6 Div. 90PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The decisions by this court are, where the suit was for commissions alleged to have been earned on sales by real estate brokers, resulting from exclusive listing of the property with one broker or agent, Handley et al. v. Shaffer, 177 Ala. 636, 59 So. 286; Hale v. Brown, 211 Ala. 106, 99 So. 645; Culver v. Gambill Realty Co., 214 Ala. 84, 107 So. 914; Ferrell v. Montgomery, 212 Ala. 44, 101 So. 732; Jackson v. Berry-Snellings Realty Co., 211 Ala. 174, 100 So. 111; Dancy v. Baker, 209 Ala. 684, 96 So. 920; Id., 206 Ala. 236, 89 So. 590; Ex parte Rawls, 208 Ala. 164, 93 So. 820; Overton v.…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Handley v. ShafferSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  2. Morgan v. Whatley & WhatleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  3. Day v. PorterIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Jennings v. TrummerOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Dancy v. BakerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McCormick v. TissierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  2. Conway v. MatthewsAlabama Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. Counts v. BarnesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  4. Pierce v. KelleyAlabama Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. Applebaum v. Lawson Realty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API