Chestang v. Kirk
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The general affirmative charge was requested by the defendants and given by the court.
Affirmative instruction should not be given if there are adverse inferences that may be drawn from the evidence by the jury. McMillan v. Aiken, 205 Ala. 35, 40, 88 So. 135. And such is the rule if the scintilla of adverse evidence is developed by the cross-examination of any witness, thus. presenting a jury question. Jones v. Bell, 201 Ala. 336, 77 So. 998. Such is the effect of the scintilla of evidence rule that obtains in this jurisdiction. Finney v. Long, 216 Ala. 628, 114 So. 200; Cleveland Laundry…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Jones v. BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railway Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Alexander v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Finney v. LongSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Inland Mutual Insurance Company v. HightowerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
- Union Central Life Insurance Company v. ScottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
- Roll v. DockerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Independent Life & Accident Insurance v. MaxwellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1974
- Faulkenberry v. RaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.