State v. Masse
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtJacobs, J.
The defendant, in a trial to the jury, was convicted of the crime of pool selling in violation of § 53-295 of the General Statutes and has appealed.
The first assignment of error relates to the denial of the defendant’s motion for a mistrial based upon the prosecuting attorney’s allegedly improper remarks in his opening argument to the jury. The court denied the motion. See Ferino v. Palmer, 133 *558Conn. 463, 466; State v. Kemp, 126 Conn. 60, 83; State v. Santello, 120 Conn. 486, 494; DeLucia v. Kneeland, 108 Conn. 191, 193. This assignment of error need not detain us because it “falls into the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- State v. MuoloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Ferino v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- Krejpcio v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- State v. KempSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Donovan v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. RotiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971