Legal Opinion

State v. Masse

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 1, 1968No. File No. CR 15-12098PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJacobs, J.

The defendant, in a trial to the jury, was convicted of the crime of pool selling in violation of § 53-295 of the General Statutes and has appealed.

The first assignment of error relates to the denial of the defendant’s motion for a mistrial based upon the prosecuting attorney’s allegedly improper remarks in his opening argument to the jury. The court denied the motion. See Ferino v. Palmer, 133 *558Conn. 463, 466; State v. Kemp, 126 Conn. 60, 83; State v. Santello, 120 Conn. 486, 494; DeLucia v. Kneeland, 108 Conn. 191, 193. This assignment of error need not detain us because it “falls into the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. State v. MuoloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  2. Ferino v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
  3. Krejpcio v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
  4. State v. KempSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  5. Donovan v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. RotiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API