Legal Opinion
State v. Kemp
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 16, 1939PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
The defendant was tried and found guilty upon a grand jury indictment in two counts charging that, while acting as the agent of the highway commissioner in the purchase of land for the state, he fraudulently agreed to receive, and did receive, a share of the commissions of two agents who represented the sellers of certain lands. He was tried, found guilty and sentenced for the crime of conspiracy. The two brokers arrested under the indictment were not put to trial with the defendant. J
The defendant, by motions to quash and dismiss, attacked the validity of the indictment because of certain…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Beazell v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- United States v. KisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- United States v. PattenSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Communist Party of United States v. Subversive Activities Control Bd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- State v. HayesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- State v. MorrillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. HerringSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. VillafaneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.