Seifert ex rel. Scoptur v. Balink
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtHigginbotham, J.
¶ 1. This case concerns the admission of expert testimony and alleged prejudicial statements made during closing argument in a medical malpractice suit. Braylon Seifert suffered nerve damage at birth that resulted in the permanent impairment of his left arm. Braylon brought suit by his guardian ad *698litem and his parents, Kimberly and David Seifert, (collectively, Braylon) against Dr. Kay Balink, the doctor who delivered Braylon, and ProAssurance Wisconsin Insurance Company (collectively, Dr. Balink) alleging negligence and lack of informed consent. At various points during the litigation, Dr.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Primiano v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- State v. PitschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
- United States v. Eduardo Sandoval-MendozaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Braylon Seifert v. Kay M. Balink, M.D.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2015
- Braylon Seifert v. Kay M. Balink, M.D.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
- Braylon Seifert v. Kay M. Balink, M.D.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
- Braylon Seifert v. Kay M. Balink, M.D.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.