Legal Opinion
Chastang v. Flynn and Emrich Company
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided October 26, 1973No. Civ. A. 71-593-M, 71-652-MPublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES R. MILLER, Jr., District Judge.
These companion cases, which were consolidated for trial, are premised upon an alleged violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., with respect to the noncontributory retirement plan 1 of Flynn and Emirch Company (hereinafter referred to as F&E). The “liability” portion of a bifurcated trial has now been completed. Plaintiffs are two retired male employees of F&E who claim that the plan discriminated against them on the basis of sex because female employees were entitled to retire earlier and receive greater…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Frontiero v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Arcangel Alvarado v. Board of Trustees of Montgomery Community College, Raul Parilla, as President of Montgomery Community CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- Hochstadt v. Worcester Foundation for Experimental Biology, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1976
- Vanguard Justice Society, Inc. v. HughesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1979
- Flesch v. Eastern Pennsylvania Psychiatric InstituteDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
- Chastang v. Flynn & Emrich Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.