Legal Opinion
Chastang v. Flynn & Emrich Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided June 10, 1976No. Nos. 74-2171 to 74-2174PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WINTER, Circuit Judge:
Alleging that a profit sharing and retirement plan which provided differing benefits to male and female participants illegally discriminated on the basis of sex, Vincent R. Chastang and Frank Ugiansky brought suit against their employer, Flynn & Em-rich Company (Company), the individuals comprising the members of the Profit Sharing Trust Committee (the Committee), and the corporate trustee under the plan, The Equitable Trust Company (Equitable). The district court found that the plan illegally discriminated against male employees. It awarded to plaintiffs as damages the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Dorothy P. Robinson v. Lorillard Corporation (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
- Kahn v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Phillips v. Martin Marietta Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Larry Nadeau v. Raymond A. Helgemoe, Warden, New Hampshire State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- City of Los Angeles Department of Water v. ManhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Bonnes v. LongCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
- Harrington v. DeVitoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.