Eames v. Haver
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County granting a new trial. John L-Campbell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Vanclief, C.
The complaint in this action may be stated substantially as follows:
In May, 1893, the defendant purchased from plaintiff twenty acres of land with orange grove thereon, for which he was to pay $8,000 in cash, and assign and deliver to plaintiff one hundred shares of the capital stock of a corporation named “Bear Valley and Alessandro *403Development Company.” As a part of the transaction, however, it was agreed that, on demand of the plaintiff, the defendant would exchange for said stock an equal number of shares of the stock of a corporation named" Bear Valley Irrigation Company,”…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Davis v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- Hanson v. SlavenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Atherton v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- Kern Valley Bank v. ChesterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Woods v. MerrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by4 opinions
- Schultz v. O'RourkeMontana Supreme Court · 1896
- Huglin v. H. M. Byllesby & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Brandelius v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Brandelius v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957