Legal Opinion

Hanson v. Slaven

California Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 1893No. 14456PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City aud County of Sau Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of non-suit in an action brought to recover the sum of one million, two hundred and seventy thousand dollars as damages for a breach of contract to deliver two thousand shares of stock of the American Contracting and Dredging Company of Hew York City. The contract was executory and in the following words: —

“San Francisco, June 10, 1882.

1 “Charles Hanson, Esq.—Dear Sir: We hereby agree to take and pay for the amount of stock subscribed by you, namely % two thousand shares at thirty dollars per share, in a company now being organized, and to be known as the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smoot's CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Stockton Sav. & Loan Soc'y v. HildrethCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. San Francisco Iron & Metal Co. v. American Milling & Industrial Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. Bell v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Katemis v. WesterlindCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Liver v. MillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Alexander v. BosworthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API