Legal Opinion

Hopwood v. Bennett

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 10, 1935No. 6 Div. 834PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The judgment of affirmance by the Court of Appeals, as disclosed by the opinion here . sought to be reviewed, is rested upon the sole point that the assignments of error were not sufficiently argued by appellant in brief as to call for any decision thereon; the opinion concluding as follows (26 Ala. App. 528, 163 So. 535) : “But, finding no ruling presented for our decision, the judgment is affirmed.” Petitioner challenges this conclusion of the Court of Appeals, and insists that his brief met the requirements of our rules.

But we think petitioner’s insistence overlooks the fact that the Court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Loveman, Joseph & Loeb v. HimrodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Birmingham Gas Co. v. SandersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  3. Hopwood v. BennettAlabama Court of Appeals · 1935

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. New York Life Ins. Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API