Legal Opinion

Hopwood v. Bennett

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 25, 1935No. 6 Div. 805PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICE, Judge.

Action by appellee, the purchaser, against appellant, the baker and seller, for negligence in selling the purchaser bread or cake containing particles of glass.

While the case, in its legal aspects, seems to be governed by, and the trial to have been conducted in accordance with, the law as laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Collins Baking Co. v. Savage, 227 Ala. 408, 150 So. 336, yet we appear to be called upon to .say nothing.

Appellant’s “argument” for error, on the rulings “assigned” as error, does not, to our minds, rise to any greater degree of sufficiency than that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. SmalleyAlabama Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. Collins Baking Co. v. SavageSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Hamilton v. CofieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. New York Life Ins. Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  2. Hopwood v. BennettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API