Birmingham Gas Co. v. Sanders
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Per curiam
Reduced to the last analysis, the argument for petitioner seeks review of the opinion of the Court of Appeals on the facts, and overlooks the limited review of this court of such opinion of the Court of Appeals; as' illustrated' in the following, among others, of our authorities: Loveman, Joseph & Loeb v. Himrod, 226 Ala. 342, 147 So. 163; Cable-Burton Piano Co. v. Thomas, 228 Ala. 112, 152 So. 468; Liberty National Life Ins. Co. v. Collier, 228 Ala. 3, 154 So. 118; Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Donaldson, 229 Ala. 276, 156 So. 865; Whisenant v. State, 223 Ala. 550, 137 So. 457;…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Postal Tel. Cable Co. v. MinderhoutSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Loveman, Joseph & Loeb v. HimrodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. CollierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Cable-Burton Piano Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Birmingham Electric Co. v. HerefordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wilkerson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
- Accardo v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
- Rogers v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Oliver v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- Hopwood v. BennettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.