Legal Opinion

New York Life Ins. Co. v. Jones

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 3, 1944No. 4 Div. 323PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Chief Justice.

The finding of the Court of Appeals that the bill of exceptions does not contain all the evidence is clearly a finding of fact, not here subject to review. Indeed, this is not controverted. Hopwood v. Bennett, 26 Ala.App. 528, 163 So. 535, certiorari denied 231 Ala. 49, 163 So. 536; Birmingham Elec. Co. v. Hereford, 25 Ala.App. 465, 149 So. 862, certiorari denied 227 Ala. 321, 149 So. 863; Loveman, Joseph & Loeb v. Himrod, 25 Ala. App. 350, 147 So. 164, certiorari denied 226 Ala. 342, 147 So. 163; Tortomasi v. State, 28 Ala.App. 499, 189 So. 901, certiorari denied 238…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Handley v. ShafferSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  2. Alexander v. WheelerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  3. Lamar v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  4. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. KimbrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. Sanders v. SteenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alabama Great Southern Railroad Co. v. BishopSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  2. Alabama Great Southern Railroad Co. v. BishopSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API