New York Life Ins. Co. v. Jones
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Chief Justice.
The finding of the Court of Appeals that the bill of exceptions does not contain all the evidence is clearly a finding of fact, not here subject to review. Indeed, this is not controverted. Hopwood v. Bennett, 26 Ala.App. 528, 163 So. 535, certiorari denied 231 Ala. 49, 163 So. 536; Birmingham Elec. Co. v. Hereford, 25 Ala.App. 465, 149 So. 862, certiorari denied 227 Ala. 321, 149 So. 863; Loveman, Joseph & Loeb v. Himrod, 25 Ala. App. 350, 147 So. 164, certiorari denied 226 Ala. 342, 147 So. 163; Tortomasi v. State, 28 Ala.App. 499, 189 So. 901, certiorari denied 238…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Handley v. ShafferSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Alexander v. WheelerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
- Lamar v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. KimbrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Sanders v. SteenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Alabama Great Southern Railroad Co. v. BishopSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
- Alabama Great Southern Railroad Co. v. BishopSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956