State v. Turlock
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Callaway
Frank Turlok, having been found guilty of perjury, moved for a new trial, which by order was denied. He has appealed from the judgment and order.
Turlok was accused of giving false testimony in the trial of Ole Skrukrud, charged with selling intoxicating liquor. In the Skrukrud trial witnesses for the state testified that Tur-lok, C. C. Dorris and W. L. Kinsey were in Skrukrud’s place of business in Glendive on the evening of January 6, 1923, and at that time and place both Dorris and Kinsey bought moonshine whisky which was drunk by the three, Turlok, Dorris and Kinsey. Testifying for the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- In Re WightSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Smith v. WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Crim v. KessingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Kaufman v. ShainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Egan v. EganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dwight v. HazlettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1929
- Hill v. BiceIdaho Supreme Court · 1943
- Washakie Livestock Co. v. MeighWyoming Supreme Court · 1934
- State Ex Rel. Cheadle v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1932
- State Ex Rel. Union Bank & Trust Co. v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.