Legal Opinion

Ecker v. Isaacs

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 25, 1906No. Nos. 14,460-(37)PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Steele county, Buckham, J., granting a motion for a new trial, after a trial and verdict in favor of plaintiff for $230.16.

1Opinion of the CourtJaggard, J.

This is an action brought by plaintiff and appellant for the recovery of money paid as a part of the consideration for the purchase of land, for money paid out by plaintiff in connection with the transaction, and for damages for alleged breach by defendant and respondent of a contract of sale of said land. The case was tried to a jury, which rendered a verdict for plaintiff. The court granted defendant’s application for a new trial. From that order this appeal was taken.

1. Plaintiff’s assignment of error was as follows:

Plaintiff assigns as error the order of court granting a new trial of said…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Elliott v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  2. Cremer v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  3. Wilcox v. Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  4. Central Montana Mines Co. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  5. Saatoff v. ScottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Benedict v. PfunderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  2. E. D. Metcalf Co. v. GilbertWyoming Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Meyer v. SaterbakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  4. Schultz v. AndrusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Lufkin v. HarveySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API