Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Twin Falls County v. Coates

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 2003No. 28397PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EISMANN, Justice.

The county seized a herd of dairy cattle on the ground that they were without proper care and attention, ultimately sold the cattle, and then brought this action seeking compensation for earing for the cattle prior to the sale and distribution of the remaining sale proceeds to those entitled to them. The owners of the cattle appeal the court-ordered distribution of the proceeds. We affirm the district court.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

William Coates, Jr., entered into an oral agreement to lease a dairy barn and pasture (Evans dairy) from William and Christina Evans.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bowles v. Pro Indiviso, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Gustaves v. GustavesIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Golay v. LoomisIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Miller v. Board of TrusteesIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
  5. King v. LangIdaho Supreme Court · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Michalk v. MichalkIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Suitts v. NixIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Bettwieser v. New York Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Trotter v. Bank of New York MellonIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Woods v. SandersIdaho Supreme Court · 2010

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API