Legal Opinion

Trotter v. Bank of New York Mellon

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 2012No. 38022PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUBSTITUTE OPINION

THE COURT’S PRIOR OPINION

HORTON, Justice.

Vermont Trotter (Trotter) is a homeowner in default on his home loan. ReconTrust, the trustee appointed by the beneficiary of the deed of trust, notified Trotter of the default and initiated a nonjudicial foreclosure on the deed of trust pursuant to I.C. § 45-1505. Upon receiving notice of the trustee’s sale, Trotter sued ReconTrust, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS), and Bank of New York Mellon. Trotter’s complaint alleged that none of the defendants 1 had standing to initiate a foreclosure under I.C. § 45-1505.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. ZichkoIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Curlee v. Kootenai County Fire & RescueIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Bowles v. Pro Indiviso, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Lockheed Martin Corp. v. Idaho State Tax CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Karlson v. HarrisIdaho Supreme Court · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Bain v. Metropolitan Mortgage Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Bank of America, N.A. v. GibsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Breckenridge Property Fund 2016, LLC v. Wally Enterprises, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Smith v. Smith (In Re Estate of Smith)Idaho Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Kelly v. KellyIdaho Supreme Court · 2022

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API