Montney v. State Ex Rel. State Highway Department
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DONNELLY, Chief Judge.
Both the plaintiff and the State Highway Department, a self-insured through the Risk Management Division (state), pursue separate appeals from the trial court’s judgment in this workers’ compensation action. Plaintiff raises four issues on appeal: (1) whether the Public Employees’ Retirement Board (PERA Board) is an indispensable or necessary party; (2) whether the trial court erred in ruling that workers’ compensation benefits awarded to plaintiff may be offset by benefits paid to him under the State Public Employees Retirement Act; (3) whether equity bars…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bettini v. City of Las CrucesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1971
- Sanchez v. Molycorp, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
- Paternoster v. La Cuesta Cabinets, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
- Segura v. Molycorp, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
- Winter v. Roberson Construction CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Antillon v. New Mexico State Highway DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
- Fuyat v. Los Alamos National LaboratoryNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
- Brewster v. Cooley & AssociatesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
- Folz v. StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
- Moya v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.