Legal Opinion

Bettini v. City of Las Cruces

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1971No. 9178PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STEPPIENSON, Justice.

Plaintiff-appellant (Plaintiff) filed suit against defendant-appellee (City) for a refund of utility charges exacted by the City in payment of an obligation owing - by Plaintiff’s predecessor in title as a condition to furnishing further service. From an adverse judgment, Plaintiff appeals.

In 1965 a mortgage foreclosure suit was pending against Penguin Motor I-Iotel in which a judgment of foreclosure was entered on November 1, 1965. City had furnished utility services to the motel for which, after some difficulties, it was paid, except for the period from shortly…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Martinez v. Research Park, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Stang v. Hertz CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Burch v. FoyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Stang v. Hertz CorporationNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. City of Chicago v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1905

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Tallman v. ABF (Arkansas Best Freight)New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. State Ex Rel. Clark v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State Ex Rel. Bird v. ApodacaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
  4. United Rentals Northwest, Inc. v. Yearout Mechanical, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Salazar v. St. Vincent HospitalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API