Legal Opinion

Folz v. State

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided May 24, 1993No. 12947PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ALARID, Judge.

This appeal concerns the trial court’s denial of Appellants’ Motion to Assess Post-Judgment Interest. Appellants claim the statute governing the award of interest, NMSA 1978, Section 56-8-3 (Cum.Supp. 1982), in effect at the time these consolidated actions were filed, authorized recovery of interest on judgments at a rate of ten percent annually. The State of New Mexico and one of its agencies, the Highway Department (hereinafter “the State”), maintain that the trial court properly prohibited the award of post-judgment interest because New Mexico law precludes interest on…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hicks v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Methola v. County of EddyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Folz v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Bradbury & Stamm Construction Co. v. Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Castillo Ex Rel. Castillo v. County of Santa FeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Trujillo v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Maryland State Highway Administration v. KimCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  3. Medina v. FullerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Albuquerque Commons P'ship v. City CouncilNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Albuquerque Commons Partnership v. City CouncilNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API