Legal Opinion

Fornataro v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 11, 1995PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McGINLEY, Judge.

Carmen Fomataro (Fomataro) appeals from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed the decision of the referee1 finding that For-nataro had not met the manifestation provisions of Section 301(c) of The Pennsylvania *855Occupational Disease Act (Disease Act)2 or 301(c)(2)3 of the Act. We affirm.

Fomataro was employed as a machinist, machine shop foreman and personnel manager by Kawecki Beryllco Corporation4 from January 18, 1958, until November 1, 1974. Subsequently, Fomataro worked for Wagner Electric Corporation from 1974 until 1981, and Vicrtex,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tosto v. Pennsylvania Nursing Home Loan AgencySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Snider v. ThornburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Boehm v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. School Districts of Deer Lakes & Allegheny Valley v. KaneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Antonucci v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sporio v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API