Snider v. Thornburgh
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
I
Mr. Chief Justice O’Brien files an opinion modifying the determination of the Commonwealth Court to the extent that the Commonwealth Court held that 65 P.S. § 402 did not violate the Equal Protection Clause in excluding ap*162pointed, non-compensated officials from the definition of “Public Official.” Mr. Justice Larsen, Mr. Justice Flaherty and Mr. Justice Kauffman join in this portion of the opinion.
Mr. Justice Roberts files an opinion which dissents from the above portion of the opinion of Mr. Chief Justice O’Brien, as well as the portion of that opinion announcing the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
3Cases cited34 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by95 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ZettlemoyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Consumer Party of Pennsylvania v. Com.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. PursellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. BarudSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. MikulanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.