School Districts of Deer Lakes & Allegheny Valley v. Kane
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
POMEROY, Justice.
In this appeal we are presented with a challenge to the constitutionality of Section 6(b), the so-called forfeiture provision, of the Public Utility Realty Tax Act, Act of March 10, 1970, P.L. 168, No. 66, § 6, 72 P.S. § 3271 et seq.' (Supp.1975) [hereinafter PURTA,] in light of Article VIII, Section 4 of the Pennsylvania Constitution of 1968. 1 We have concluded that the challenge must fail.
Before addressing the merits of the issue presented, it is necessary to give some of the background of the constitutional provision under consideration and a summary…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Wiegand v. WiegandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Daly v. HemphillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Tosto v. Pennsylvania Nursing Home Loan AgencySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. Life Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Milk Control Commission v. BattistaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ZettlemoyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Consumer Party of Pennsylvania v. Com.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Young v. Com. Bd. of Probation and ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Commonwealth v. SutleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Snider v. ThornburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.