Legal Opinion

Kasparian v. County of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 14, 1995No. B080752PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CROSKEY, J.

In this appeal, the defendants and appellants, County of Los Angeles, Michael D. Antonovich, an elected member of the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors (collectively, the County defendants), Western Jewelry Mart Joint Venture (Joint Venture), Kirkor Suri and Jak Sukyas (collectively, the WJM defendants) seek to overturn a seven-figure judgment, including both compensatory and punitive damages, entered on November 1, 1993, in favor of the plaintiff and respondent Avedis Rasparían.

Plaintiff’s claim, as it went to the jury, was based on an alleged conspiracy between the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Bear Stearns & Co.California Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Seaman's Direct Buying Service, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Shoemaker v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Fresno Motors, LLC v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Bigler-Engler v. Breg, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. JRS Products, Inc. v. Matsushita Electric Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. PMC, Inc. v. Saban Entertainment, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. Khajavi v. Feather River Anesthesia Medical GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API