JRS Products, Inc. v. Matsushita Electric Corp. of America
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RAYE, J.
A franchisor that wrongfully terminates a franchise is liable to the franchisee for breach of contract, not for intentional interference with prospective economic advantage. In this case, the franchisee’s first cause of action against the franchisor was, in fact, predicated on a breach of contract theory, but the trial court erroneously granted a summary adjudication of that claim. After we dismissed the franchisee’s appeal on the contract claim as an appeal from a nonfinal judgment, the franchisee was compelled to try the case solely on a tort theory and prevailed. We reverse…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court · 2003
- Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Merrill v. Navegar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Ward v. TaggartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Della Penna v. Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- In Re Marriage of Falcone & FykeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Cable Connection, Inc. v. DirecTV, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2008
- Premier Medical Management Systems, Inc. v. California Insurance Guarantee Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- City of Santa Maria v. AdamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- County of San Diego v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.