Legal Opinion
Grand Rapids Plastics, Inc. v. Craig M. Lakian
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 12, 1999No. 98-1698PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., Chief Judge.
Grand Rapids Plastics, Inc. appeals the district court’s findings that its Robinson-Patman Act claims were barred by the statute of limitations and that Grand Rapids had no tortious interference claim because it had no business relationship or expectancy with Daikyo-Deeoma. We conclude that the district court correctly dismissed both claims.
I
In 1988, Daikyo-Deeoma, a supplier of automobile parts to automaker Mazda, needed to find a molder of custom-designed interior parts. Reiso Hiromitsu was the head of Daikyo-Deeoma at this time and until 1990. Craig…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Musson Theatrical, Inc., and Modernage Photo Service, Inc., for Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Federal Express CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Williams v. International Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- West Penn Allegheny Health System, Inc. v. UPMCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Concord Boat Corp. v. Brunswick Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Lynette Chapman v. The Higbee Company, D/B/A Dillard Department Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- In Re Buspirone Patent LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.