Legal Opinion

Merkle v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 23, 2002PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge FRIEDMAN.

Jeffrey D. Merkle (Claimant) petitions for review of the August 17, 2001 order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (WCAB), affirming the decision of the workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) to deny Claimant’s petition to review the notice of compensation payable. In his petition, Claimant alleged that his average weekly wage was not calculated properly. We affirm.

On February 26, 1997, while employed with Hofmann Industries (Employer), Claimant sustained a work-related injury to his left arm. Pursuant to a notice of compensation payable, Claimant received…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Norton v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Bethlehem Structural Products v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Vernon)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Port Authority v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Colpetzer v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Merkel v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Zerby v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Colpetzer v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Zerby v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API