Legal Opinion

In Re: Grand Jury Proceedings United States of America v. John Doe

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 21, 2000No. 1999PublishedCited by 251 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FEINBERG, Circuit Judge:

This appeal raises significant questions of first impression in this court regarding application of the attorney-client and work-product privileges in the corporate context. The questions are (1) whether a corporate officer can impliedly waive the corporation’s attorney-client and work-product privileges in his grand jury testimony, even though the corporation has explicitly refused .such a waiver; and if the answer is yes, (2) what factors a district court should consider in deciding whether a waiver has occurred. We hold there can be such a waiver, and discuss below…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by251 opinions

  1. Sims v. BlotCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  2. Pritchard v. County of ErieCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  3. Boyd v. Comdata Network, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
  4. In Re Columbia/Hca Healthcare Corporation Billing Practices LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  5. Docket No. 02-6239Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003

246 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API