In Re: Grand Jury Proceedings United States of America v. John Doe
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FEINBERG, Circuit Judge:
This appeal raises significant questions of first impression in this court regarding application of the attorney-client and work-product privileges in the corporate context. The questions are (1) whether a corporate officer can impliedly waive the corporation’s attorney-client and work-product privileges in his grand jury testimony, even though the corporation has explicitly refused .such a waiver; and if the answer is yes, (2) what factors a district court should consider in deciding whether a waiver has occurred. We hold there can be such a waiver, and discuss below…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by251 opinions
- Sims v. BlotCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Pritchard v. County of ErieCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Boyd v. Comdata Network, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
- In Re Columbia/Hca Healthcare Corporation Billing Practices LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Docket No. 02-6239Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
246 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.