Legal Opinion
Mott's Super Markets, Inc. v. Frassinelli
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 20, 1961PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, C. J.
The plaintiff has appealed from a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas which sustained the commissioner of consumer protection, the defendant, in issuing an order, pursuant to § 42-112 of the General Statutes, that the plaintiff cease and desist from advertising and selling in its supermarkets two products, both well-known brands, at less than “cost to the retailer” as defined in General Statutes § 42-111.
The legislation under consideration is chapter 736 of the General Statutes, as amended, entitled “Unfair Sales Practices.” Section 42-112 contains, in summary, the following provisions:…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Tot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- McFarland v. American Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Amsel v. BrooksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- State v. ZazzaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Radwick v. GoldsteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Adams v. RubinowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- State v. JamesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. WatsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Caldor's, Inc. v. Bedding Barn, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Ducharme v. City of PutnamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.