Foster v. Crandell
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
GEER, Judge.
This appeal arises out of an order of the trial court granting summary judgment to defendants in part, denying summary judgment in part, and excluding one of plaintiffs’ expert witnesses. All parties have appealed. Because this is an interlocutory appeal, we have limited our review only to those questions over which we have jurisdiction: (1) the entry of summary judgment on all of Freida Foster’s claims; and (2) the entry of summary judgment on plaintiffs’ claims for punitive damages. We dismiss the parties’ appeals with respect to the remaining issues since they are not properly…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Dickens v. PuryearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Johnson v. Ruark Obstetrics & Gynecology Associates, P.A.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- Viar v. North Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
- Collingwood v. General Electric Real Estate Equities, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Chidnese v. ChidneseCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- McFadyen v. Duke UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2011
- Ostwalt v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2008
- Russ v. CauseyDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2010
- Hardin v. York Memorial ParkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.