Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Blasioli

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 16, 1998No. 47 W.D. Appeal Docket 1997PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SAYLOR, Justice.

We allowed appeal to determine whether evidence of statistical probabilities calculated using the product rule is admissible at trial in a criminal case to assist the trier of fact in assessing the probative significance of a deoxyribonucleic acid (“DNA”) match. We agree with the trial court and the Superior Court that the product rule, as applied in DNA forensic analysis, is generally accepted in the relevant scientific communities and that such evidence therefore meets the standard for admissibility.

In May, 1993, J.D. was assaulted and raped. The crimes occurred late…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  3. State v. BibleArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. CopelandWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. People v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Grady v. Frito-Lay, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Watts v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Commonwealth v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Commonwealth v. FreemanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Commonwealth v. Jacoby, T., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API