Commonwealth v. Blasioli
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SAYLOR, Justice.
We allowed appeal to determine whether evidence of statistical probabilities calculated using the product rule is admissible at trial in a criminal case to assist the trier of fact in assessing the probative significance of a deoxyribonucleic acid (“DNA”) match. We agree with the trial court and the Superior Court that the product rule, as applied in DNA forensic analysis, is generally accepted in the relevant scientific communities and that such evidence therefore meets the standard for admissibility.
In May, 1993, J.D. was assaulted and raped. The crimes occurred late…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- State v. BibleArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. CopelandWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Grady v. Frito-Lay, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Watts v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
- Commonwealth v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Commonwealth v. FreemanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Commonwealth v. Jacoby, T., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.