Legal Opinion

Hemphill v. Co-Operative Refinery Assn.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 11, 1953No. 38,874PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Price, J.:

The question here is whether the loss of a totally sightless eye is compensable under the Workmen’s Compensation Act.

Claimant, who was thirty-one years of age, had been employed for several years as a pipefitter’s helper, and on an occasion while so employed was working within a few feet of an electric arc welding outfit. He was not equipped with a welder’s hood and felt heat from the welding arc. He was awakened that night by a pain and soreness in his left eye. The next morning he reported the fact to his employer and was given medical…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Justice v. Arkansas City Flour Mills Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  2. Marquiss v. Bilwil Mining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1949

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Blair v. Armour and CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. Bender v. Salina Roofing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  3. Justice v. Continental Can Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  4. McKenzie v. Gulf Hills Hotel, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Moss v. Davey Tree Expert Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API