Hemphill v. Co-Operative Refinery Assn.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Price, J.:
The question here is whether the loss of a totally sightless eye is compensable under the Workmen’s Compensation Act.
Claimant, who was thirty-one years of age, had been employed for several years as a pipefitter’s helper, and on an occasion while so employed was working within a few feet of an electric arc welding outfit. He was not equipped with a welder’s hood and felt heat from the welding arc. He was awakened that night by a pain and soreness in his left eye. The next morning he reported the fact to his employer and was given medical…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Justice v. Arkansas City Flour Mills Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938
- Marquiss v. Bilwil Mining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1949
3Cited by8 opinions
- Blair v. Armour and CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
- Bender v. Salina Roofing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1956
- Justice v. Continental Can Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1953
- McKenzie v. Gulf Hills Hotel, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1954
- Moss v. Davey Tree Expert Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.