Justice v. Continental Can Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Wedell, J.:
This is an appeal by the employer, Continental Can Company, a corporation, and its insurance carrier, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, in a workmen’s compensation case.
The case involves the loss of claimant’s left eye and a previous partial loss of vision in his right eye, both injuries having occurred in the course of claimant’s work for the same employer. Separate claims were filed for each injury. They were set for hearing before the commissioner on the same day. The claim involving the right eye was heard first. A separate award was…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. MatlockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
- Norman v. Consolidated Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1929
- Kauffman v. Co-Operative Refinery Assn.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1950
- Standard Surety & Casualty Co. of New York v. Standard Acc. Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- Wise v. Morgan-Mack Motor Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1952
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1960
- Attebery v. Griffin Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1957
- Angleton v. Foster Wheeler Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1954
- Hobelman v. Mel Krebs Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1961
- Kuhn v. Grant CountySupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.