Legal Opinion

Kallish v. American Base Ball Club

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 17, 1939No. Appeal, 292PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

At the trial of this action verdicts were directed in favor of the defendant. Plaintiffs, in this appeal, contend that the case was for the jury.

The plaintiff-father took his four year old son, the minor-plaintiff, to the park of the defendant on the occasion of a base ball , game which attracted large crowds. Though there were seating accommodations for only 33,000, the defendant sold admissions to 38,311 persons and about one of every seven admitted to the park viewed the game from the passage ways or aisles of the stands. The defendant in overselling the seating capacity…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Haugh v. Harris Bros. Amusement Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. Le NormandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
  3. Thurber v. Skouras Theatres Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  4. Shayne v. Coliseum Building Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1933
  5. McCaw v. Union Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Schentzel v. Philadelphia National League ClubSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Sierocinski v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
  3. Wood v. Conneaut Lake Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. Sims v. Strand TheaterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Cigan v. Arcadia Garden Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API