Haugh v. Harris Bros. Amusement Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Linn,
These appeals are from judgments for husband and wife in an action to recover for personal injuries to the wife resulting from a fall in defendant’s motion picture theater. The contentions are that defendant was not negligent (that the theater was properly constructed and adequately lighted) ; that the injured plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence; and that, if both be rejected, a new trial should be awarded.
The negligence charged and proved may be said to be inadequate lighting of the foot of a stairway, — in view of its peculiar construction, — intended…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Durning v. HymanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Kulka v. NemirovskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Oakley v. RichardsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1918
- Branch v. KlattMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Rutherford v. Academy of MusicSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Jones v. Three Rivers Management Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Dively v. Penn-Pittsburgh Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Schentzel v. Philadelphia National League ClubSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Amon v. ShemakaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Murray v. Pittsburgh Athletic Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.