Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Nathan v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided January 11, 2013No. 11-2077PublishedCited by 438 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge KEENAN wrote the opinion, in which Judge MOTZ and Judge BREDAR joined.
OPINION
BARBARA MILANO KEENAN, Circuit Judge:
Noah Nathan (Relator), a sales manager for Takeda Pharmaceuticals (Takeda), brought this qui tarn action against his employer under the False Claims Act (the Act), 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729 through 3733. Relator alleges that Takeda violated § 3729(a)(1)(A) of the Act by causing false claims to be presented to the government for payment under Medicare and other federal health insurance programs. 1 After allowing Relator to file a third amended complaint…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Kolon Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
- Stan Laber v. Francis J. Harvey, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- Edwin P. Harrison, and United States of America, Party in Interest v. Westinghouse Savannah River CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Johnson v. Oroweat Foods Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by438 opinions
- Thomas Foglia v. Renal Ventures ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- United States Ex Rel. Chorches v. American Medical Response, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- United States Ex Rel. May v. Purdue Pharma L.P.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- United States ex rel. Grant v. United Airlines Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- United States ex rel. Heath v. AT & T, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
433 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.