Legal Opinion
E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Kolon Industries, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided March 11, 2011No. 10-1103, 10-1275PublishedCited by 2,189 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Reversed by published opinion. Judge WYNN wrote the opinion, in which Judge KEENAN and Senior Judge BALDOCK joined.
OPINION
WYNN, Circuit Judge:
Under the Sherman Act, a plaintiff making monopoly and attempted monopoly claims must allege a relevant geographic market to help the court determine whether the defendant has monopoly power. In this case, the district court held that Supreme Court precedent required including in the relevant geographic market definition all locations where product suppliers are headquartered. Yet the Supreme Court case upon which the district court relied, Tampa…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2,189 opinions
- Adrian King, Jr. v. Jim RubensteinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
- Owens v. Baltimore City State's Attorneys OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
- Southern Walk at Broadlands Homeowner's Ass'n v. OpenBand at Broadlands, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- Roman Zak v. Chelsea Therapeutics InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- Guidotti v. Legal Helpers Debt Resolution, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
2,184 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.