Legal Opinion

Powers v. Nesbit

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1891No. 14,859PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Grant Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The appellees, in their complaint, assert title in fee simple to the land in dispute, and specifically set *498forth the nature of their title. The title which they assert is claimed through Elizabeth Rodgers, deceased, who was the wife of John R. Rodgers. The husband was adjudged a bankrupt, and the property was sold under an order made in the bankruptcy proceedings, on the first day of February, 1878.

It may be said, as well at the outset as elsewhere, that, upon the sale under the order in bankruptcy, the title of the ancestor of the appellees became vested. Elliott v. Gale, 113 Ind. 383 (393),…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Luntz v. GreveIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Dumont v. DuforeIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Spencer v. McGonagleIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Ketchum v. SchicketanzIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Branson v. StudabakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Blake v. MinknerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Kennedy v. HaskellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  4. Hammer v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  5. Plank v. HinkleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API