Legal Opinion
Blake v. Minkner
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided January 23, 1894No. 16,526PublishedCited by 29 opinions
From the Marion Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtDailey, J.
In appellants’ complaint, filed in the Marion Circuit Court, September 10th, 1890, partition was demanded of certain real estate situate in Indianola, an addition to the city of Indianapolis, which the appellants claim as the heirs at law of Eliza Blake, deceased, who had been the widow of James Blake, deceased, and Warren S. Blake, who had been a son of said James and Eliza Blake.
I.n the complaint it is alleged that in the years 1835 and 1842 James Blake acquired title to the real estate in *419controversy jointly, with James M. Ray and others, and that Blake and Ray bought out the other…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Reeder v. . SayreNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Illinois Central Railroad v. Cobb, Christy & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1872
- Bowen v. PrestonIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Avery v. AkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Bowen v. SwanderIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Sinclair v. GunzenhauserIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Oölitic Stone Co. v. RidgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
- Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. SteinIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Geisendorff v. CobbsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
- Fort Wayne Iron & Steel Co. v. ParsellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.