Plank v. Hinkle
Indiana Court of Appeals
From Carroll Circuit Court; James P. Wason, Judge. Action by Minta R. Hinkle and others against James R. Plank and others. From a judgment for plaintiffs, the defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtBatman, J.
This action was instituted by appellees Minta R. Hinkle and Albert A. Newer, guardian of Lela Irwin and Marie Irwin, against appellants to partition certain real estate. The complaint is in the usual form for such a proceeding, alleging that appellant James R. Plank is the owner of an undivided three-fifths of said real estate; that appellee Minta R. Hinkle is the owner of an undivided one-fifth thereof; and that Lela Irwin and Marie Irwin are each the owner of an undivided one-tenth thereof. Appellant James R. Plank filed a cross-complaint in two paragraphs against appellees and his…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Luntz v. GreveIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Miller v. NobleIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Finley v. CathcartIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Thorp v. HanesIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Green v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Raper v. Union Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- State v. DaleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- Raper v. UNION FEDERAL SAV. & L. ASS'N OF EVANSVILLEIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975