DePineda v. Price
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson
Manuel Sesario DePineda, appearing pro se, appeals from the orders of the Fremont County District Court dismissing his petitions for habeas corpus relief. His sole claim on this appeal is that his conviction for first-degree murder is void for want of jurisdiction because the evidence presented at trial established that the crime took place entirely in Adams County and because he was tried in the City and County of Denver by the Denver District Attorney’s Office. 1 We affirm the district court’s denial of relief.
I
In 1989, a jury convicted DePineda of first-degree murder based on his…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- White v. Denver District Court, Division 12Supreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- DePineda v. HemphillCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Turman v. BuckallewSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- People v. BastardoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- People v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- People v. CaliSupreme Court of Colorado · 2020
- People v. RussellColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
- People v. TolbertColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
- People v. CloseColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
- People v. VersteegColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.