Legal Opinion
Nutter v. Wefald
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided March 16, 1995No. 90-1436-SACPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CROW, District Judge.
The case comes before the court on the plaintiffs “Motion for Injunction In Camera” (Dk. 81) and “Motion to Reopen Case and Vacate the Memorandum and Order” (Dk. 82). The defendants, Lou Ann Smith and Judith E. Banks, have filed responses in opposition (Dk. 84 and 85) to which the plaintiff has replied (Dk. 86 and 87). After reviewing the written materials submitted, the court believes oral argument would not assist it in deciding the central legal issues. Because the plaintiffs motions are plainly devoid of any legal merit, the court can decide them…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Seven Elves, Incorporated v. Jack S. Eskenazi, Esko Industries, Inc., Gary Liebman and Jack RibackCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Anant Kumar Tripati v. William C. BeamanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Bankers Mortgage Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Cessna Finance Corporation v. Bielenberg Masonry Contracting, Inc., Paul BielenbergCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- Bud Brooks Trucking, Inc. v. Bill Hodges Trucking Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Aerotech Resources, Inc. v. Dodson Aviation, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2002
- United States v. EdmonsonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1996
- Harvey v. Yellow Freight System, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1996
- Matter of BurnsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- United States v. JohnsonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1996
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.