Snow v. Frye
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Sequoyah County; *John H. Pitchford, Judge. Action by Ruth Snow and Daniel Snow against Charles C. Frye and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
ROBERTSON, C.
This appeal was filed January 3, 1911. Plaintiffs in error have filed no brief, nor has any excuse been offered for their failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned. The appeal should, therefore, be dismissd for want of prosecution under rule 7 (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi) of this court. Hass v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290, 111 Pac. 543; Maddin v. McCormick, 27 Okla. 779, 117 Pac. 200; Bender v. Bender et al., 30 Okla. 288, 119 Pac. 205; Cox v. Rogers, 30 Okla. 296, 119 Pac. 205; McClelland v. Witherall, 30 Okla. 287, 119 Pac. 205.
By the Court:…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hass v. McCampbell, City ClerkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- McClelland v. WitherallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Cox v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Bender v. BenderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Maddin v. McCormickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
3Cited by7 opinions
- Turner Hardware Co. v. John Deere Plow Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Deible v. Union Iron WorksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Deible v. Union Iron WorksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Hill v. City of KingfisherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Miller v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.