Gale v. Mayhew
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kent; Perkins, J. Assumpsit by William H. Gale against Percy. G. May-hew on a promissory note. A judgment for plaintiff is •reviewed by defendant on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
From appellant’s brief we compile the following statement of the facts in this case: The defendant had for some time prior to November or December, 1907, heen employed by the Grand Rapids Felt Boot Company, ■and while so employed became acquainted with one William R. Pelton. Pelton had been working there for about 20 years as millwright, and part of the time he had charge *97of the carding and picking rooms. The felt boot company-had failed in May, and it was only a question of time before they would have to suspend operations. Mr. Pelton looked into the cotton felt business with a view to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Myers v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Markey v. CoreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Aniba v. YeomansMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Borden v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Fisher v. MeisterMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Marion National Bank v. HardenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1918
- Implement Credit Corp. v. ElsingerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Prichard v. StrikeUtah Supreme Court · 1926
- Divelbiss v. BurnsMississippi Supreme Court · 1931
- Schmidt v. PeggMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.